Production of Food in the Future Essay

The mentation of fecundateing a macrocosm of 9 jillion by the year 2050 is daunting. Consider the United Nations betoken that 1 gazillion state in the human race today argon hungry. The average number of undernourish people worldwide between 1990and 2006 is 850 million with the postgraduate point of 1.023 billion hungry people, reached in the 2008 crises. earlier we laughingstock determine if we can feed 9 billion people in 2050, is it not a better question to ask Have we met the demand of our current population? Increases in population flummoxth, naughtyer(prenominal) nutrition prices due to cast upd demand, and go poorness levels both in the US and world(prenominal)ly are all obstacles that deficiency to be controlled. To begin with, strategies mentioned in The Future of Food need to be establish to commit, in crop to overcome the challenges we face in meeting the exploitation demand for food.Elizabeth Dickinson states, the world is invariably on the verge of a food crisis (144).The population in this world is growing bigger and larger e trulyday, so imagine how much food turnout would need to summation to feed 9 billion people by 2050. For example, in Elizabeth Dickinsons selective information graphic essay, the largest number of respondents voted that the world would need to increase its food end product by 70 percent. That is an terrible percentage because we would need to assume increasing the turnout from now, so by the time 2050 comes around we leave alone harbor change magnitude by 70 percent. If we defy the process of starting to increase the food output then we result probably still wont be able to feed the livelong world in the future.As the population grows, change magnitude demand will lead to higher food prices. For example, at any time demand for a goodness rises, prices generally surge. On the early(a) hand, at any time demand for a commodity goes down, prices decrease. The cycle runs the same with gr ant. An increase in supply on constant demand will cause a decrease in prices mend decreasing demand will cause an increase in prices. In other words, if there is besides much of the same supply merely critical demand then the price will go down, rather than having too much of the same supply with very high demand, prices will go up. passel often ask, Whats going on in the world today that is causing this food payoff problem to happen? The answer remains, the population growth. A few examples of what has caused food prices to rise so high are China and India encounter the largest and quickest growing populations generating demand for food from around the globe, so concern on prices has been raising demand from these countries, the Japanese tsunami and quake drove up seafood prices by 6%, and veggie prices rose 50% month due to knead damage in Australia, Russia, and South America.If these prices keep rising we will not be able to feed the whole world and we will still atta in hungry people in poor countries. Elizabeth Dickinson states, privation is the main problem. Even when food is abundant, many go hungry because of the lack of income to purchase food (146). To load down the global hunger rate, ten respondents voted that the international community should promote broader economic growth. In other words, we should produce a wider and vigorous quantity of growth. Strategies we can use to face all these challenges are transmittable engineering, stress-resistant breeding, and the use of ecosystems in farming.The Green Revolution, which did not consider around Africa, is another problem facing food production. Elizabeth Dickinson proclaimed, It failed because costly hybrid seeds and fertilizers quickly degraded soils and impoverished humiliated farmers (147). This Green Revolution was ineffective. The use of fertilizer increased significantly, epoch per capita agriculture decreased dramatically. Yield keep to stay stationary in throughout Afri ca in the main crops such as maize, rice, wheat, etc.The fountain Revolutions affect on farming and food production has caused virulent disputes. Some people repugn that it has relieve many lives by enlarging agricultural productivity, while others argue that it ha made a catastrophic impact on fiddling farmers. It has also effected the environments by generating a massive global marketplace for seed, pesticide, and fertilizer corporations (GRAIN). Experiments studied in the past have came to the stopping point by stating, a main reason for the inefficiency of Africas agriculture is that the crops on the great majority of small farms are not the high-yielding varieties in common use on the other continents (GRAIN).Lastly, in What Do We deserve? all of the diametric stupefys of economic justice furbish up to The Future of Food by Elizabeth Dickinson. The first simulate is the libertarian pretence. This model is intimately the inequality of people and how different races, classes, genders, and people with different sexuality preferences fatiguet have the same opportunities and dont start out their lives the same. For example, people of different classes either grow up rich, middle class, or poor. Arora states, So while the racetrack may look nice and shiny, the runners dont begin at the same double-dyed(a) point (87). The second model is the meritocratic model.This model is about how some people are already innate(p) with talents and attributes while others dont have that advantage. Those who do not have those advantages have to work hard to earn their wins. For example, society does not break-dance as much praise to a mortal who isnt natural with a talent or attribute than they do to those who already have it in them. Arora expresses, Are their wins not as arbitrary from a moral standpoint as the wins of those natural with ash grey spoons in their mouths? (88). The third model is the egalitarian model.This model talks about how if the people who are born with natural gifts dont work for their winner but still get rewarded, they should share their rewards with the man who do work to earn rewards. For example, if someone is born wealthy because of the family they come from, then they should be unselfish to others and share what they have instead of being greedy. They did not work hard to earn the wealth. It was just pass to them very easily. Arora proclaims, We should certainly encourage people to hone and exercise their aptitudes, but we should be clear that they do not morally deserve the rewards their aptitudes earn from the market (88).All of these models relate to The Future of Food in very similar ways. It shows that not all people can afford the increasing prices of food, which causes world hunger. The ones born with attributes that make their life easier would be able to form fame and fortune and wont have to worry about going hungry. Also they have things a distribute easier than others. People dont deserve anything unless they have earned it. It is not fair to those who are difficult hard to comply but fail and get no credit at all.Those trying to succeed are trying to provide for themselves in order to afford the food while prices are get higher and higher. To sum it up, food production in the future will be a very big challenge we will have to face, but all obstacles can be overcome if we preen our minds to it. I believe that if we all work unitedly on the strategies talked about earlier, we can achieve ply all nine billion people in this world, including all the starving people in the countries that stick from poverty. Also with all the types of models of economic justice, society need to be fair with the right ways on rewarding people from either different classes or with different advantages.